Case 4.2: HIV and a Researcher’s Duty to Warn (p. 185)
What moral principles seem to be in conflict in this scenario?
How would you resolve the conflict?
Suppose John’s only options are either to maintain confidentiality or violate it by revealing the subject’s HIV status to her boyfriend (the subject refuses to notify him voluntarily).
What should John do, and on what grounds could either action be justified?
Suppose that state law prohibits researchers from revealing a subject’s HIV status.
Would this fact change you judgment?
Should any such legal fact change your judgment?
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.Read more
Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.Read more
Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.Read more
Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.Read more
By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.Read more