Assessment criteria include, paper format, content literature cited and article choice. In addition to the three articles used for analysis, supporting references should also be used. A minimum of one unique supporting article is required in the Introduction and Conclusion sections. A student example paper has been uploaded to Blackboard. This paper is well-done and hits almost all the “Meets expectations” criteria in the rubric.
Summary sums up the strengths and weaknesses of each article; compares and contrasts articles to one another summary lacks some details, misses a strength/weakness of one of the articles; occasionally compares and contrasts but mainly lists each articles strengths and weakness separately summary lacks detail, includes either strengths or weaknesses; fails to compare and contrasts articles to one another
Significance establishes practical and theoretical significance of body of work; has your chosen article been cited by others; did your articles spark other researches hypotheses or questions; are there any practical applications; implication (social, political, technological, medical) to the research; cites at least one other supporting reference (unique from introduction) logic not clear to the theoretical significance of the body of work; not thorough in establishing its significance; cites at least one other supporting reference (unique from introduction) no connection to theoretical significance of body of work; fails to cite at least one supporting reference Literature cited Format one journal format chosen and used throughout in bibliography and in-text citations some in-text citations were not in the same format; 1-2 errors in bibliography consistency lacking for in-text citations; bibliography with 3+ formatting errors Subject Chosen articles were all on the same topic; topic was specific enough so that an analysis was possible topics were not consistent or were too broad/general each article was on a separate topic and the topics were without reasonable similarities Citation Each reference was used and cited correctly within the body of the paper; three focal references were analyzed; at least 5 references used references were occasionally cited incorrectly; three focal references were analyzed; 4 total references used two or fewer references were analyzed; no supporting references used Quantity minimum of 5, 1 unique to intro, 1 unique to discussion and 3 critically reviewed missing 1 unique missing 2 unique and/or 1 of critically reviewed.
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.Read more
Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.Read more
Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.Read more
Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.Read more
By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.Read more